New look looks good. One thing glaringly missing in the "About" section: Who are "we"----why must you be such a secret and have to remain anons. Journalistically that is just not right.
I think Murph meant to say he is not the author of this blog, which anyone could tell based on the difference in writing styles. Especially anonymous stalkers with a Murph fetish. (Yes, that means you.)
Ok, so the new look is fine. I guess.
ReplyDeleteBut when are you gonna update/change/or get rid of that dumb tagline at the top by
murphstahoe?
can't you do better than that?
Just like Arizona, if you want the defending champ to lose, you have to go out and beat him.
ReplyDeleteBring it - anon.
you already lost.
ReplyDeleteNew look looks good. One thing glaringly missing in the "About" section: Who are "we"----why must you be such a secret and have to remain anons. Journalistically that is just not right.
ReplyDeleteyea, they have always been anonymous. that's why this little blog has so little credibility.
ReplyDeleteThey, whoever "they" are, quote Murph because he is one of the "they" who put this blog together.
ReplyDeleteYea, we know that murph is part of this tiny blog..
ReplyDeletejust wish "they"would update that stupid tag line.
A Joel Panzer/John Murphy production.
ReplyDeletere Murphs comment: huh?
ReplyDeleteYea, I know..re: murphs comments. usually they are cryptic and unclear.
ReplyDeleteThe word is spelled "yeah."
ReplyDelete"Murph's" has an apostrophe.
I think Murph meant to say he is not the author of this blog, which anyone could tell based on the difference in writing styles. Especially anonymous stalkers with a Murph fetish. (Yes, that means you.)